I ended up just finding TC was easier more useful overall. I also like to increase temperature as load becomes more spent and use muti strains at different temperature settings. In replay I see a wide range of temperature variations depending on draw rate. I want the temperature to remain stable no matter how I or what type of draw I use. I might like to sip or draw a huge cloud. In replay mode it hit fine as long as you maintain the same draw rate. After that is where replay losses it's usefulness I feel. I could see having a replay profile set up to flavor chase first couple hits of a stem. If really interested in it check out this great interview. I hope explaining this in a way that makes sense. Then to throttle back the heat when sense a dry hit. More to heat up a liquid to release in a way to output same flavor over and over. It not designed to maintain same temperatures through the draw.
Then reproduce that same heating pattern over and over. To recreate the heating cycle that reproduces the best flavored hit. Replay is more designed for ejuice user in mind. Just for our use I feel TC or a combo of the 2 might be the better option. I can understand why they came up with replay. I also wonder how important the battery charge is to the outcome? Wonder what's better to run with a 510 device attached or without? I felt with attached as thats closer to real world usage? FYI heres my 2nd run numbers testing with iheat attached. Going run it a couple more times and average. Only difference is amount of battery charge btw my Paranormal tests.īeen awhile since ran first case analyze on the wismec. Weird the test on paranormal are all coming of slightly different value.
0 kommentar(er)
